RESOURCE

The VA Reference Check: The 15-Minute Call That Prevents Expensive Hiring Mistakes

Resource

Quick answer

A reference check with a VA's former employer reveals delegation fit, reliability under pressure, and communication style in 15 minutes. Ask about ownership moments, not just job duties.

The Most Skipped Step in VA Hiring

The candidate was excellent. The interview went well. You liked the energy, the specific examples, the way they asked smart questions at the end. The references were listed on the application. You told yourself you would call them after the weekend. Then you extended the offer on Friday and never made the calls.

This is the most common and most expensive shortcut in VA hiring. Not because references always reveal disqualifying information, most do not, but because they reveal the single trait that predicts whether a hire succeeds: whether this person takes ownership or waits for instructions.

That trait is invisible in an interview. A candidate who waits for instructions can describe their past work fluently, respond professionally on a call, and pass a skills test. The gap only appears when they are actually working, when a situation arises that was not in the job description and no one is watching to tell them what to do.

A 15-minute reference call, run correctly, reveals that gap before it costs you.


Why Reference Calls Usually Fail

Most reference calls fail before they start because the caller frames the call incorrectly. “I’m just calling to verify some information” signals to the reference that this is a compliance exercise, not a real conversation. References hear that framing and give compliance answers: start date, end date, general positive impression, done.

The second failure is asking questions that are too direct. “Was she reliable?” produces “Yes, very.” “Did he communicate well?” produces “He was great.” These questions are answerable with socially acceptable lies, and references give socially acceptable answers.

The Three-Layer Reference Call structure fixes both problems. It opens with context (so the reference understands why their honesty matters), moves through factual verification into performance probing, and closes with indirect questions that surface real patterns without triggering defensive answers.


The Three-Layer Reference Call

Layer 1, Factual Verification takes about three minutes and establishes baseline credibility. Confirm the candidate’s actual title, tenure, primary responsibilities, and reason for leaving. These facts are checkable, and discrepancies here are a serious signal, not because everyone exaggerates slightly, but because the degree of discrepancy tells you something about their relationship with truth.

Ask: “Can you confirm the dates they worked with you and the title they held?” Then: “What were the main categories of work they handled for you?” Compare their answer to what the candidate told you. A candidate who described themselves as “managing all executive communications” but whose reference says “they handled inbox monitoring and some scheduling” is telling you something important about how they represent themselves.

Layer 2, Performance Probing is the core of the call and takes seven to eight minutes. This is where most callers go too shallow. The goal is not to hear that the candidate performed well, you will hear that regardless. The goal is to hear specific instances that either confirm or complicate the picture.

Layer 3, Character Reveal uses indirect questions to surface patterns without triggering defensiveness. These are the questions that get references to say something they did not plan to say, not because you tricked them, but because the question requires them to think rather than recall.


The Specific Questions to Ask

These are the exact questions to use in each layer. Do not read them robotically, use them as a guide and let the conversation move naturally.

Layer 1 Questions:

“Can you confirm the dates they worked with you and the role they held?” Pause after they answer. Sometimes a pause after factual confirmation will prompt the reference to add context unprompted.

“What were the main things they were responsible for day-to-day?” Listen for scope. If they mention managing things or owning processes, ask: “When you say they managed that, were they running it independently or working within a system you had already set up?”

Layer 2 Questions:

“Tell me about a time this person had a week where a lot was happening at once. How did they handle it?” You are listening for whether the reference describes the candidate as someone who absorbed pressure or transmitted it.

“Was there a time they caught something you would have missed, or flagged a problem before it became one?” Strong references will give a specific example. Weak references will say “Oh, they were always on top of things” and cannot name an instance.

“What kinds of tasks did they handle completely independently, without coming back to you for input?” This question reveals the candidate’s actual autonomy ceiling, which is often lower than they imply.

“How did they communicate when something was taking longer than expected, or when they weren’t sure how to proceed?” This is the single most predictive question in the call. A VA who communicates proactively about uncertainty is one of the rarest and most valuable things you can hire. A VA who goes quiet when stuck costs you weeks.

“Did you ever have to follow up on something they said they would do?” Pause. “How often would you say that happened?” References will almost always answer honestly because the question is framed factually, not judgmentally.

“If you were in a position to rehire this person today, would you? And what would the role look like?” The “what would the role look like” part is critical, it tells you where the reference actually placed this person’s skills, even if they say yes to rehiring.

Layer 3 Questions, The Indirect Question Method:

“What kind of projects did this person genuinely thrive on?” This question’s true value is what it excludes. If they describe thriving on structured, repetitive work and your role is creative and unpredictable, that is information.

“What kind of manager or working style brought out their best?” This surfaces the candidate’s dependency patterns without asking directly. A candidate who “thrives with detailed guidance” will struggle in a role where the expectation is autonomous execution.

“Is there anything about the way they work that took you a while to understand or adapt to?” This question gives the reference permission to share something genuine without framing it as a criticism. The answers here are often the most useful in the entire call.


How to Spot a Bad Reference

A bad reference is not one who says something negative, those are often your most valuable calls. A bad reference is one who cannot give you specificity.

When a reference answers every question with general positives, “She was great,” “He was always reliable,” “I would hire her again in a heartbeat”, without being able to name a single specific instance, one of two things is true: either they did not work closely enough with this candidate to have real information, or they are protecting them for reasons unrelated to their performance.

Either way, a reference who cannot give you specific examples is not a useful data source. Thank them and move on.

Watch for hedged language: “I think she was generally pretty reliable” or “He was good, mostly.” These qualifications are not filler, they are signals. Follow them. Ask: “When you say ‘mostly’, was there something specific that comes to mind?”

The most useful red flag is a reference who is technically positive but noticeably brief. They confirm facts. They say good things. They end quickly. That brevity is the signal. A reference who genuinely admired someone’s work does not need a reason to stop talking.


Who to Call and How to Ask

Always ask the candidate for three references: one direct manager, one peer or colleague, and one person the candidate supported in a junior capacity. The manager tells you about performance. The peer tells you about collaboration. The person they supported tells you about execution.

Ask the candidate: “I’d like to speak with your most recent direct manager, a colleague you worked closely with, and ideally someone who received work from you directly. Can you provide contact information for all three?” A candidate who hesitates, provides only personal friends, or suggests references they coached you on how to contact has given you information before the call even happens.

Call the references yourself. Do not email. Do not use a form. Voice calls produce spontaneous, unguarded responses that written formats do not. The pause before an answer, the slight shift in warmth when describing one project versus another, these are real signals that text cannot carry.

When you reach the reference, open with: “Thank you for taking a few minutes. I want to be honest with you, I’m trying to understand how this person works, not just confirm that they’re good. The more specific you can be, the more helpful it is for everyone, including them. I’ll keep everything you share in confidence.” That framing produces better conversations.


What to Do With What You Hear

After each reference call, write three sentences immediately: what you heard about their strengths, what you heard about their limits, and whether anything surprised you compared to what the candidate told you.

If two of three references independently describe the same behavior, positive or negative, treat it as a confirmed pattern. One reference can be an outlier. Two references independently noting the same thing is data.

If a reference call contradicts something the candidate said directly, go back to the candidate. Say: “One of your references mentioned something that was a bit different from how you described it, can we talk through that?” How they handle that conversation tells you almost as much as the reference did.

The reference check is not the place to make the decision. It is the place to confirm or complicate the decision you are already leaning toward. When references are clean and consistent, they give you confidence. When they reveal something unexpected, they give you the one thing money cannot buy back: the chance to find out before you hire.


Your Next Step

Before your next VA hire clears the interview stage, identify three references from their application and schedule those calls. Block 15 minutes for each. Use the Layer 2 questions as your script and the Layer 3 questions to close.

If a candidate cannot provide a recent direct manager reference, even with a reasonable explanation, treat that as a signal worth investigating. Ask why. The answer is part of the data.

One 15-minute call to a former employer is worth more than any resume credential, any interview performance, and any skills test. Run the call. It is the step that separates people who look good from people who are good.

At a glance

Audience

Business owners, entrepreneurs, and executives hiring and managing virtual assistants

Problem it addresses

Most reference checks are skipped or treated as formalities, missing the single best opportunity to learn whether a VA candidate takes ownership or waits for instructions.

Keep exploring

This is one entry in the VA Hiring Circle library. Browse the Virtual Assistant Knowledge Hub for more problems, roles, workflows, and systems.

Explore the Virtual Assistant Knowledge Hub →